Psychopaths have a personality disorder that makes them immune to feelings. As a consequence, they cannot adopt a proper social behavior. Instead, they develop egotistical features that allow them to survive in a community with their lack of remorse and empathy. A new study indicates that such people are not born liars. Instead, they are best learners when it comes to the art of telling a lie.

Scientists Recorded the Lies of Their 52 Participants with fMRI

Previous research showed that psychopaths develop weaker functions in the part of the brain that deals with personality, decision-making, and social skills. Therefore, they linked such traits of the brain to psychopathic disorder.

However, the new study that appeared in the journal Translational Psychiatry started from the assumption that psychopaths are not natural liars. Instead, their neural networks that are in charge of executive cognitive processing might be superior.

Therefore, Tatia Lee from the University of Hong Kong carried out a small experiment with 52 students. Out of this total of participants, 29 scored high on psychopathic tests, while the others had low results.

The practical part of the experiment consisted of participants being invited to tell a lie. First off, they received a series of photos. Students had to say in which images they see someone they know. However, scientists present at the experiment were the ones that told participants to either lie or tell the truth. Their answers were recorded with fMRI.

Psychopaths Proved to Be Best Learners at Telling Lies

The results indicated that those with strong psychopathic traits were faster at lying than those with normal grades. These students used to speed up their false responses while the others kept an average answer time the whole time.

“The stark contrast between individuals with high and low levels of psychopathic traits in lying performance following two training sessions is remarkable.”

So far, it was unclear why psychopaths are known for their tendency to manipulate. However, this study indicates that in the lack of emotional intelligence, they are best learners when it comes to lies. The act of telling a lie requires control, memory, and attention.

Image source: 1

While the United States sees less and less deadly cases of cancer with each year, not all parts enjoy the same rates of improvement. On the contrary, a new report indicates that rural regions go through a bigger impact of this condition than urban areas.

Rural Regions Are Harmed by a Limited Access to Health Care

On Thursday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a new study that shows villages are more susceptible to developing new cases of cancer than in other parts. Not only that, but their number of fatal cases is higher as well. The most widely spread types of cancer are those influenced by tobacco, such as laryngeal and lung cancer, and those types that can be prevented through routine checks like cervical or colorectal cancers.

The report suggests that such high differences between rural and urban regions are caused by certain agents. For instance, rural areas are more susceptible to certain risk factors such as obesity, poor physical condition, and smoking. However, the most influential feature stands in limited access to health care. Therefore, there are a fewer diagnoses made in time that can prevent a fatal end than in other parts.

Around 15% of American Population Lives in Rural Areas

Rural Americans have a lower percentage of insured citizens. Federal health data show that their insurance doesn’t cover preventive services so well. Therefore, the report doesn’t link cancer rates to geographical positioning but to access to health care. Treatment opportunities, preventive measures, and early diagnosis are key factors in battling aggressive conditions as cancer is.

The CDC paper is the first of its kind that describes cancer rates in urban and rural settings. At least 46 million Americans live in rural areas which means 15% of the population. The findings of the survey highlight the poor health care services that this percentage of citizens have at their disposal.

Image source: 1

The World Health Organization announced an aggressive outbreak of cholera. The location of the outburst is Yemen. There are already 1,500 lives lost to this disease. Other 246,000 people might be in danger of getting sick. The Yemen population was already weakened by a civil war that lasted for two years. This condition might have accelerated the spread of the cholera outbreak.

The New Cholera Outbreak Started in April and Claimed 1,500 Lives Already

World Health Organization’s representative in Yemen, Nevio Zagaria, made some breaking news declaring that since an outbreak of cholera started in April, there are around 246,000 suspected cases. The death toll reached 1,500 for the moment. Unfortunately, the organization claimed that a quarter of these fatal cases are children.

This week, WHO announced the halfway mark at 218,798 cases. There is already an emergency mobilization that managed to fade out the impact of such a phenomenon two months since its beginnings. The health care state in this country is in a deplorable condition. Medical staff hasn’t received payment in over six months. On the other hand, WHO managed to keep an active group of paramedics, doctors, nurses, and cleaners through incentives only. This cholera network is working relentlessly to put an end to this event.

WHO Intends to Add 5,000 Treatment Beds for This National Health Crisis

The World Bank sent financial support to this mobilization. WHO managed to organize health centers with up to 60 beds for each one of them. Each of these points has its own staff of 14 medical workers overseeing the place in shifts. The organization wants to put at the disposal of the country 5,000 beds to mitigate the cholera outbreak only.

The most worrying aspect of this phenomenon is the speed with which this illness develops. There are almost 5,000 new suspect cases with each passing day. Children have the riskiest chances in front of this health threat. Representatives aim to open the country again to health solutions, commercial flights, and economic opportunities.

Image source: 1

Recent health trends lifted coconut oil to the level of a miracle ingredient. It can rejuvenate your skin and act as a cooking oil with no risks of getting fat at the same time. However, experts in the field don’t share the same view. The American Heart Association released a report to clarify once and for all the facts about healthy fats.

Peanut or Corn Can Offer a Better Health Alternative

To form the right view about present context, a recent New York Times survey discovered that 72% of U.S. citizens are under the belief that coconut oil is healthy. The same paper found that 37% of nutritionists share the same view. On the other hand, AHA has a completely different perception.

The American non-profit organization claimed that this type of oil is full of saturated fats. In fact, people would be better off if they replace this ingredient with peanut or corn. This way, they can slash the chances of getting cardiovascular disease by approximately 30%. This amount would be the equivalent of a cholesterol-lowering statin drug.

Coconut Oil Is Nothing More Than a Source of Saturated Fats According to AHA

Over recent years, people were led to believe that this cooking oil has almost supernatural benefits. Some of its presumable advantages include dementia prevention, anti-aging properties, and heart protection. However, it turns out that all these claims are just a construct of marketing efforts. In fact, 80% of this nutrient consists of saturated fats just like in butter. On the other hand, butter contains only 40% of such fats that contribute to the elevation of bad cholesterol in a person.

While the digital media was never able to reach a consent about the nature of this type of oil, the American Heart Association supported the same view ever since the 1960s. Through its recent statement, the association is just repeating the same overrated reviews of this aliment as it did so far. It encourages people with high cholesterol to consume only 5% of their daily intake from saturated fats. For people without this health difficulty, they are safe to increase the rate to 10%.

Image source: 1